---
title: "Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)"
url: "https://barrierefreihochzwei.de/en/wcag/1-2-1-audio-only-and-video-only-prerecorded"
language: "en"
description: "Podcasts need a transcript, silent videos a text or audio alternative. Learn how to meet WCAG 1.2.1 for prerecorded audio-only and video-only media."
published: "2025-01-01T08:00:00+01:00"
updated: "2026-10-15T09:41:59+02:00"
---

# Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)

When podcasts and silent videos need a second form.

- **Erfolgskriterium:** 1.2.1
- **Prinzip:** Perceivable
- **Konformitätsstufe:** Level A
- **Erklärung beim W3C:** [www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/audi...](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/audio-only-and-video-only-prerecorded.html)

Success criterion 1.2.1

# 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)

Level APerceivable

When podcasts and silent videos need a second form.

## 1. What is the goal of this criterion?

A podcast tells a story with nothing but voices. An explainer video without sound shows instructions with nothing but images. Both work brilliantly – as long as you can hear or see.

But what if you can’t? For deaf people, an audio-only piece simply doesn’t exist. For blind people, a silent video stays a black box. That’s why the goal of Success Criterion 1.2.1 is: prerecorded content that consists only of audio or only of video needs an equivalent alternative in another form.

## 2. What exactly does it require?

The criterion distinguishes two cases – both for prerecorded (not live) content:

**Audio-only content** such as podcasts, interviews or voice messages needs a text alternative that conveys the same information – in practice, a full transcript. Summarising the topic isn’t enough: someone reading has to learn the same as someone listening. That includes relevant sounds and who is speaking.

**Video-only content** such as silent animations, time-lapses or product demos without sound needs either a text alternative as well – or an audio track that describes what happens in an equivalent way.

There’s one exception: if the media itself is already the alternative to a text (such as a read-aloud version of an article) and is clearly labelled as such, no further alternative is needed – otherwise you’d be producing alternatives for alternatives.

Videos with both picture *and* sound are covered by other criteria, mainly [Captions (Prerecorded)](https://barrierefreihochzwei.de/en/wcag/1-2-2-captions-prerecorded) and [Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)](https://barrierefreihochzwei.de/en/wcag/1-2-3-audio-description-or-media-alternative-prerecorded).

## 3. Why does it matter for accessibility?

Audio and video formats are popular – and without alternatives they shut out entire groups of users:

- **Deaf and hard of hearing people** get access to podcasts and audio content through transcripts
- **Blind and visually impaired people** understand silent videos through descriptions or audio tracks
- **Deafblind people** can read transcripts on a braille display – often their only access to media content
- **People with auditory processing disorders** can follow what was said in writing

And everyone who can’t or doesn’t want to listen right now benefits too: in an open-plan office, on the train without headphones, or when skimming instead of listening for 40 minutes.

## 4. How to meet the criterion

**Plan transcripts from the start.** If you have a podcast script, you’re almost done. Transcribing after the fact takes more effort than thinking about it during production.

**Use speech recognition as a starting point, not the final result.** Automatic transcription gives you a good first draft – names, technical terms and speaker changes still need editing.

**Make the alternative easy to find.** The transcript belongs right next to the media: on the same page or clearly linked (“Read transcript”).

**For silent videos, describe what matters.** What does someone who can’t see the video need to know? The action, on-screen text and relevant details – not every camera angle.

**Label media alternatives clearly.** If your audio is just the spoken version of an article, say so – then the exception applies. Important: the media must not contain more information than the text.

## 5. Why this criterion matters for businesses

### 1. Added value, not extra work

A transcript is reusable content: one podcast episode can become blog posts, quotes for social media and searchable content on your website.

### 2. Discoverability for audio and video

Search engines only have limited access to spoken content. A transcript makes it findable as text – an indirect benefit, since accessibility itself isn’t a ranking factor.

### 3. Legal requirements

Since 28 June 2025, the European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) has applied to many consumer products and services, such as online shops and banking services; Germany implements it through the Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz (BFSG). The benchmark is EN 301 549, which refers to WCAG 2.1 Level AA for web content – Level A criteria like this one are included. Public sector bodies have their own obligations under the EU Web Accessibility Directive. (General information, not legal advice.)

## 6. The success criterion in the W3C’s words

> **Success Criterion 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded) (Level A)**
> 
> For prerecorded audio-only and prerecorded video-only media, the following are true, except when the audio or video is a media alternative for text and is clearly labeled as such:
> 
> - **Prerecorded Audio-only:** An alternative for time-based media is provided that presents equivalent information for prerecorded audio-only content.
> - **Prerecorded Video-only:** Either an alternative for time-based media or an audio track is provided that presents equivalent information for prerecorded video-only content.

In short: prerecorded audio-only content needs a text alternative, prerecorded video-only content needs a text alternative or a descriptive audio track – unless the media is itself labelled as an alternative to text.

**Official explanation from the W3C**

The W3C explains every success criterion in depth – with intent, examples and techniques.

[Understanding 1.2.1](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/audio-only-and-video-only-prerecorded.html)

## More criteria from “Perceivable”

 [  1.1.1 Level A ### Non-text Content

When images need words.

 ](https://barrierefreihochzwei.de/en/wcag/1-1-1-non-text-content) [  1.2.2 Level A ### Captions (Prerecorded)

When videos need to make sense without sound.

 ](https://barrierefreihochzwei.de/en/wcag/1-2-2-captions-prerecorded) [  1.2.3 Level A ### Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)

When videos need a second narrative track.

 ](https://barrierefreihochzwei.de/en/wcag/1-2-3-audio-description-or-media-alternative-prerecorded)
